写在前面：
笔者采用传统方式搭建的主从环境，主库更新记录后，从库不能将数据同步过去，在从库查看主从复制状态，Read_Master_Log_Pos 和 Exec_Master_Log_Pos 一致，I/O、SQL线程都正常，没有主从延迟发生，没有人为的设置延迟更新参数，主库binlog和从库relay log都有相应的更新记录，从库错误日志没有任何复制相关的error信息。如果你和笔者是同样的情况，那么你可能和笔者一样，遇到了复制过滤规则的 "坑"
环境：
MySQL5.6（MySQL5.7，MySQL8没有亲自测过）
场景复现：
Master配置：
[mysqld]
datadir = /home/data/mysql3306/
port = 3306
server_id = 1
binlog_format = row
log_bin = /home/data/mysql3306/binlog
SLave配置：
[mysqld]
datadir = /home/data/mysql3306/
port = 3306
binlog_format = row
server_id=2
relay_log = /home/data/mysql3306/relaylog
replicate_do_db=edusoho_e,statis
Master授权复制连接用户：
mysql> grant replication slave on *.*to repliter@'192.168.32.2' identified by PASSWORD ' *6BB4837EB74329105EE4568DDA7DC67ED2CA2AD9';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
mysql> flush logs;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec)
mysql> show master status;
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
| binlog.000004 | 120 | | | |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Slave开启数据复制：
CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_HOST='192.168.32.3',MASTER_USER='repliter',MASTER_PASSWORD='123456',MASTER_PORT=3306,MASTER_LOG_FILE='binlog.000004',MASTER_LOG_POS=120;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 2 warnings (0.05 sec)
mysql> start slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec)
mysql> show slave status\G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Slave_IO_Running: Yes
Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
Replicate_Do_DB: edusoho_e,statis
主从复制状态正常！
Master变更了数据：
mysql> create database edusoho_e;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> use edusoho_e;
Database changed
CREATE TABLE `t1` (
`id` INT(11) UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`xname` VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`address` CHAR(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`sex` TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1',
`hobby` VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`age` TINYINT(2) DEFAULT '18',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `idx_name` (`xname`)
) ENGINE=INNODB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
mysql> INSERT INTO `edusoho_e`.`t1` (`xname`, `address`, `hobby`) VALUES ('edusoho_e', 'ldl', 'dba');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
mysql> show master status;
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
| binlog.000004 | 882 | | | |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Master的binlog日志是正常的
然而你在Slave主机上看不到新建的表及其数据
Slave：
mysql> show databases;
+--------------------+
| Database |
+--------------------+
| information_schema |
| mysql |
| performance_schema |
| test |
+--------------------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
查看主从复制状态：
mysql> show slave status\G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event
Master_Host: 192.168.32.3
Master_User: repliter
Master_Port: 3306
Connect_Retry: 60
Master_Log_File: binlog.000004
Read_Master_Log_Pos: 882
Relay_Log_File: relaylog.000002
Relay_Log_Pos: 1042
Relay_Master_Log_File: binlog.000004
Slave_IO_Running: Yes
Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
Replicate_Do_DB: edusoho_e,statis
Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 882
Seconds_Behind_Master: 0
SQL_Delay: 0
你会发现 I/O、SQL 线程正常；Read_Master_Log_Pos 和 Exec_Master_Log_Pos 值相同；Seconds_Behind_Master 值为0，说明没有主从延迟发生；SQL_Delay 值为0，说明没有主观设置延迟插入；虽然设置了主从过滤规则，但也只是复制该库的，难道是Slave的relay log出了问题，没有记录Master的日志？
到Slave去分析relay log日志，会发现也是有相应的Master的日志的
[root@slave mysql3306]# mysqlbinlog -v --base64-output=decode relaylog.000002
;
;
;
DELIMITER ;
# at 4
#190530 9:32:17 server id 2 end_log_pos 120 CRC32 0x35d47ba3 Start: binlog v 4, server v 5.6.16-log created 190530 9:32:17
# at 120
#700101 8:00:00 server id 1 end_log_pos 0 CRC32 0x0166516e Rotate to binlog.000004 pos: 120
# at 164
#190530 9:29:02 server id 1 end_log_pos 0 CRC32 0xfea4f75a Start: binlog v 4, server v 5.6.16-log created 190530 9:29:02
# at 280
#190530 9:35:18 server id 1 end_log_pos 229 CRC32 0x6b0d2047 Query thread_id=2 exec_time=0 error_code=0
SET TIMESTAMP=1559180118;
SET @@session.pseudo_thread_id=2;
SET @@session.foreign_key_checks=1, @@session.sql_auto_is_null=0, @@session.unique_checks=1, @@session.autocommit=1;
SET @@session.sql_mode=1073741824;
SET @@session.auto_increment_increment=1, @@session.auto_increment_offset=1;
;
SET @@session.character_set_client=33,@@session.collation_connection=33,@@session.collation_server=33;
SET @@session.lc_time_names=0;
SET @@session.collation_database=DEFAULT;
create database edusoho_e
;
# at 389
#190530 9:35:31 server id 1 end_log_pos 653 CRC32 0x1268f754 Query thread_id=2 exec_time=0 error_code=0
use `edusoho_e`;
SET TIMESTAMP=1559180131;
CREATE TABLE `t1` (
`id` INT(11) UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`xname` VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`address` CHAR(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`sex` TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1',
`hobby` VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`age` TINYINT(2) DEFAULT '18',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `idx_name` (`xname`)
) ENGINE=INNODB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8
;
# at 813
#190530 9:35:41 server id 1 end_log_pos 730 CRC32 0x20610ab1 Query thread_id=2 exec_time=0 error_code=0
SET TIMESTAMP=1559180141;
BEGIN
;
# at 890
#190530 9:35:41 server id 1 end_log_pos 791 CRC32 0xc2edbad8 Table_map: `edusoho_e`.`t1` mapped to number 540
# at 951
#190530 9:35:41 server id 1 end_log_pos 851 CRC32 0xaa57d74f Write_rows: table id 540 flags: STMT_END_F
### INSERT INTO `edusoho_e`.`t1`
### SET
### @1=1
### @2='edusoho_e'
### @3='ldl'
### @4=1
### @5='dba'
### @6=18
# at 1011
#190530 9:35:41 server id 1 end_log_pos 882 CRC32 0x7de64644 Xid = 1350
COMMIT;
DELIMITER ;
# End of log file
ROLLBACK ;
;
;
查看Slave的错误日志，也没有看到任何复制error相关的信息
那么问题来了，这可能是遭遇了BUG！ 笔者也忘记了，是某位大佬说过，还是在某博客中看到过，如果Slave配置了replicate_do_db 过滤规则，如果写成了如下形式：
replicate_do_db=edusoho_e,statis 可能会遭遇BUG，需要分开来写
replicate_do_db=edusoho_e
replicate_do_db=statis
重启Slave以验证猜想
Master：
mysql> flush logs;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.44 sec)
mysql> show master status;
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
| binlog.000005 | 120 | | | |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
SET @@session.sql_log_bin=0;
DROP DATABASE `edusoho_e`;
mysql> create database edusoho_e;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> use edusoho_e;
Database changed
CREATE TABLE `t1` (
`id` INT(11) UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`xname` VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`address` CHAR(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`sex` TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1',
`hobby` VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`age` TINYINT(2) DEFAULT '18',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `idx_name` (`xname`)
) ENGINE=INNODB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
mysql> INSERT INTO `edusoho_e`.`t1` (`xname`, `address`, `hobby`) VALUES ('edusoho_e', 'ldl', 'dba');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
Slave：
mysql> show databases;
+--------------------+
| Database |
+--------------------+
| information_schema |
| edusoho_e |
| mysql |
| performance_schema |
| test |
+--------------------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from edusoho_e.t1;
+----+-----------+---------+-----+-------+------+
| id | xname | address | sex | hobby | age |
+----+-----------+---------+-----+-------+------+
| 1 | edusoho_e | ldl | 1 | dba | 18 |
+----+-----------+---------+-----+-------+------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
你会发现新建的表和数据都同步过去了，说明确实是 replicate_do_db 过滤规则的 "坑"
