前言
在我们开始之前,希望您能最好已经满足以下条件:
1、有一份编译后的Android源码(亲自动手实践才会有更深入的理解)
2、对Binder机制有一定的了解
本文启动流程分析基于Android 5.1的源码。为什么是5.1的源码呢?因为手边编译完的代码只有这个版本…另外,用什么版本的源码并不重要,大体的流程并无本质上的区别,仅仅是实现细节的调整,找一个你熟悉的版本就好。
1、启动时序图
作为一个轻微强迫症的人,整理的时序图,相信大家按图索骥,一定能搞明白整个启动流程:
说明:为了让大家更清楚的理解整个过程,将时序图中划分为三个部分:Launcher进程、System进程、App进程,其中有涉及共用的类以L / A进行区分表示跟哪个进程有关,便于理解。
2、关键类说明
整个启动流程因为会涉及到多次Binder通信,这里先简要说明一下几个类的用途,方便大家理解整个交互流程:
1、ActivityManagerService:AMS是Android中最核心的服务之一,主要负责系统中四大组件的启动、切换、调度及应用进程的管理和调度等工作,其职责与操作系统中的进程管理和调度模块相类似,因此它在Android中非常重要,它本身也是一个Binder的实现类。
2、Instrumentation:顾名思义,它用来监控应用程序和系统的交互。
3、ActivityThread:应用的入口类,系统通过调用main函数,开启消息循环队列。ActivityThread所在线程被称为应用的主线程(UI线程)。
4、ApplicationThread:ApplicationThread提供Binder通讯接口,AMS则通过代理调用此App进程的本地方法。
5、ActivityManagerProxy:AMS服务在当前进程的代理类,负责与AMS通信。
6、ApplicationThreadProxy:ApplicationThread在AMS服务中的代理类,负责与ApplicationThread通信。
3、流程分析
首先交代下整个流程分析的场景:用户点击Launcher上的应用图标到该应用主界面启动展示在用户眼前。
这整个过程涉及到跨进程通信,所以我们将其划分为时序图中所展示三个进程:Launcher进程、System进程、App进程。为了不贴过长的代码又能说清楚进程间交互的流程,这里简述几个重要的交互点。
从时序图上大家也可以看到调用链相当长,对应的代码量也比较大,而且时序图只是分析了这个一个场景下的流程。道阻且长,行则将至!
3.1 Launcher响应用户点击,通知AMS
Launcher做为应用的入口,还是有必要交代一下的,我们来看看Launcher的代码片段,Launcher使用的是packages/apps/Launcher3的的源码。
public class Launcher extends Activity
implements View.OnClickListener, OnLongClickListener, LauncherModel.Callbacks,
View.OnTouchListener, PageSwitchListener, LauncherProviderChangeListener {
...
public void onClick(View v) {
// Make sure that rogue clicks don't get through while allapps is launching, or after the
// view has detached (it's possible for this to happen if the view is removed mid touch).
if (v.getWindowToken() == null) {
return;
}
...
Object tag = v.getTag();
if (tag instanceof ShortcutInfo) {
onClickAppShortcut(v);
} else if (tag instanceof FolderInfo) {
...
} else if (v == mAllAppsButton) {
onClickAllAppsButton(v);
} else if (tag instanceof AppInfo) {
startAppShortcutOrInfoActivity(v);
} else if (tag instanceof LauncherAppWidgetInfo) {
...
}
}
private void startAppShortcutOrInfoActivity(View v) {
...
boolean success = startActivitySafely(v, intent, tag);
...
}
boolean startActivitySafely(View v, Intent intent, Object tag) {
...
try {
success = startActivity(v, intent, tag);
} catch (ActivityNotFoundException e) {
...
}
return success;
}
boolean startActivity(View v, Intent intent, Object tag) {
intent.addFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
try {
...
if (user == null || user.equals(UserHandleCompat.myUserHandle())) {
// Could be launching some bookkeeping activity
startActivity(intent, optsBundle);
} else {
...
}
return true;
} catch (SecurityException e) {
...
}
return false;
}
}
通过starActicity辗转调用到
Activity:startActivityForResult
而后则调用至Instrumentation:execStartActivity
,代码片段如下:
public class Instrumentation {
...
public ActivityResult execStartActivity(
Context who, IBinder contextThread, IBinder token, Activity target,
Intent intent, int requestCode, Bundle options) {
IApplicationThread whoThread = (IApplicationThread) contextThread;
...
try {
...
int result = ActivityManagerNative.getDefault()
.startActivity(whoThread, who.getBasePackageName(), intent,
intent.resolveTypeIfNeeded(who.getContentResolver()),
token, target != null ? target.mEmbeddedID : null,
requestCode, 0, null, options);
...
} catch (RemoteException e) {
}
return null;
}
...
}
这里的
ActivityManagerNative.getDefault
返回ActivityManagerService
的远程接口,即ActivityManagerProxy
接口,有人可能会问了为什么会是ActivityManagerProxy
,这就涉及到Binder通信了,这里不再展开。通过Binder驱动程序,ActivityManagerProxy
与AMS服务通信,则实现了跨进程到System进程。
3.2 AMS响应Launcher进程请求
从上面的流程我们知道,此时AMS应该处理Launcher进程发来的请求,请参看时序图及源码,此时我们来看
ActivityStackSupervisor:startActivityUncheckedLocked
方法,目测这个方法已经超过600行代码,来看一些关键代码片段:
public final class ActivityStackSupervisor implements DisplayListener {
...
final int startActivityUncheckedLocked(ActivityRecord r, ActivityRecord sourceRecord,
IVoiceInteractionSession voiceSession, IVoiceInteractor voiceInteractor,
int startFlags, boolean doResume, Bundle options, TaskRecord inTask) {
final Intent intent = r.intent;
final int callingUid = r.launchedFromUid;
...
final boolean launchSingleTop = r.launchMode == ActivityInfo.LAUNCH_SINGLE_TOP;
final boolean launchSingleInstance = r.launchMode == ActivityInfo.LAUNCH_SINGLE_INSTANCE;
final boolean launchSingleTask = r.launchMode == ActivityInfo.LAUNCH_SINGLE_TASK;
int launchFlags = intent.getFlags();
...
// We'll invoke onUserLeaving before onPause only if the launching
// activity did not explicitly state that this is an automated launch.
mUserLeaving = (launchFlags & Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NO_USER_ACTION) == 0;
...
ActivityRecord notTop =
(launchFlags & Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_PREVIOUS_IS_TOP) != 0 ? r : null;
// If the onlyIfNeeded flag is set, then we can do this if the activity
// being launched is the same as the one making the call... or, as
// a special case, if we do not know the caller then we count the
// current top activity as the caller.
if ((startFlags&ActivityManager.START_FLAG_ONLY_IF_NEEDED) != 0) {
...
}
...
// If the caller is not coming from another activity, but has given us an
// explicit task into which they would like us to launch the new activity,
// then let's see about doing that.
if (sourceRecord == null && inTask != null && inTask.stack != null) {
final Intent baseIntent = inTask.getBaseIntent();
final ActivityRecord root = inTask.getRootActivity();
...
// If this task is empty, then we are adding the first activity -- it
// determines the root, and must be launching as a NEW_TASK.
if (launchSingleInstance || launchSingleTask) {
...
}
...
}
...
if (inTask == null) {
if (sourceRecord == null) {
// This activity is not being started from another... in this
// case we -always- start a new task.
if ((launchFlags & Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK) == 0 && inTask == null) {
Slog.w(TAG, "startActivity called from non-Activity context; forcing " +
"Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK for: " + intent);
launchFlags |= Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK;
}
} else if (sourceRecord.launchMode == ActivityInfo.LAUNCH_SINGLE_INSTANCE) {
// The original activity who is starting us is running as a single
// instance... this new activity it is starting must go on its
// own task.
launchFlags |= Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK;
} else if (launchSingleInstance || launchSingleTask) {
// The activity being started is a single instance... it always
// gets launched into its own task.
launchFlags |= Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK;
}
}
...
// We may want to try to place the new activity in to an existing task. We always
// do this if the target activity is singleTask or singleInstance; we will also do
// this if NEW_TASK has been requested, and there is not an additional qualifier telling
// us to still place it in a new task: multi task, always doc mode, or being asked to
// launch this as a new task behind the current one.
if (((launchFlags & Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK) != 0 &&
(launchFlags & Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_MULTIPLE_TASK) == 0)
|| launchSingleInstance || launchSingleTask) {
// If bring to front is requested, and no result is requested and we have not
// been given an explicit task to launch in to, and
// we can find a task that was started with this same
// component, then instead of launching bring that one to the front.
if (inTask == null && r.resultTo == null) {
// See if there is a task to bring to the front. If this is
// a SINGLE_INSTANCE activity, there can be one and only one
// instance of it in the history, and it is always in its own
// unique task, so we do a special search.
ActivityRecord intentActivity = !launchSingleInstance ?
findTaskLocked(r) : findActivityLocked(intent, r.info);
if (intentActivity != null) {
...
}
}
}
...
if (r.packageName != null) {
// If the activity being launched is the same as the one currently
// at the top, then we need to check if it should only be launched
// once.
ActivityStack topStack = getFocusedStack();
ActivityRecord top = topStack.topRunningNonDelayedActivityLocked(notTop);
if (top != null && r.resultTo == null) {
if (top.realActivity.equals(r.realActivity) && top.userId == r.userId) {
...
}
}
} else{
...
}
boolean newTask = false;
boolean keepCurTransition = false;
TaskRecord taskToAffiliate = launchTaskBehind && sourceRecord != null ?
sourceRecord.task : null;
// Should this be considered a new task?
if (r.resultTo == null && inTask == null && !addingToTask
&& (launchFlags & Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK) != 0) {
...
if (reuseTask == null) {
r.setTask(targetStack.createTaskRecord(getNextTaskId(),
newTaskInfo != null ? newTaskInfo : r.info,
newTaskIntent != null ? newTaskIntent : intent,
voiceSession, voiceInteractor, !launchTaskBehind ),
taskToAffiliate);
...
} else {
r.setTask(reuseTask, taskToAffiliate);
}
...
} else if (sourceRecord != null) {
} else if (!addingToTask &&
(launchFlags&Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_REORDER_TO_FRONT) != 0) {
} else if (inTask != null){
} else {
}
...
targetStack.startActivityLocked(r, newTask, doResume, keepCurTransition, options);
...
return ActivityManager.START_SUCCESS;
}
...
}
函数经过intent的标志值设置,通过
findTaskLocked
函数来查找存不存这样的Task,这里返回的结果是null,即intentActivity
为null,因此,需要创建一个新的Task来启动这个Activity
。现在处理堆栈顶端的Activity
是Launcher
,与我们即将要启动的MainActivity
不是同一个Activity
,创建了一个新的Task里面来启动这个Activity
。
经过栈顶检测,则需要将Launcher推入Paused状态,才可以启动新的
Activity
。后续则调用至ActivityStack:startPausingLocked
,我们来看一下这个函数:
final class ActivityStack {
...
final boolean startPausingLocked(boolean userLeaving, boolean uiSleeping, boolean resuming,
boolean dontWait) {
if (mPausingActivity != null) {
...
}
ActivityRecord prev = mResumedActivity;
if (prev == null) {
...
}
...
mResumedActivity = null;
mPausingActivity = prev;
mLastPausedActivity = prev;
mLastNoHistoryActivity = (prev.intent.getFlags() & Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NO_HISTORY) != 0
|| (prev.info.flags & ActivityInfo.FLAG_NO_HISTORY) != 0 ? prev : null;
prev.state = ActivityState.PAUSING;
...
if (prev.app != null && prev.app.thread != null) {
try {
...
prev.app.thread.schedulePauseActivity(prev.appToken, prev.finishing,
userLeaving, prev.configChangeFlags, dontWait);
} catch (Exception e) {
...
}
} else {
...
}
...
}
...
}
这里的
prev.app.thread
是一个ApplicationThread
对象的远程接口,通过调用这个远程接口的schedulePauseActivity
来通知Launcher进入Paused状态。至此,AMS对Launcher的请求已经响应,这是我们发现又通过Binder通信回调至Launcher进程。
3.3 Launcher进程挂起Launcher,再次通知AMS
这个流程相对会简单一些,我们来看
ActivityThread
:
public final class ActivityThread {
...
private void handlePauseActivity(IBinder token, boolean finished,
boolean userLeaving, int configChanges, boolean dontReport) {
ActivityClientRecord r = mActivities.get(token);
if (r != null) {
...
performPauseActivity(token, finished, r.isPreHoneycomb());
// Make sure any pending writes are now committed.
if (r.isPreHoneycomb()) {
QueuedWork.waitToFinish();
}
// Tell the activity manager we have paused.
if (!dontReport) {
try {
ActivityManagerNative.getDefault().activityPaused(token);
} catch (RemoteException ex) {
}
}
...
}
}
...
}
这部分Launcher的
ActivityThread
处理页面Paused并且再次通过ActivityManagerProxy
通知AMS。
3.4 AMS创建新的进程
创建新进程的时候,AMS会保存一个
ProcessRecord
信息,如果应用程序中的AndroidManifest.xml配置文件中,我们没有指定Application标签的process属性,系统就会默认使用package的名称。每一个应用程序都有自己的uid,因此,这里uid + process的组合就可以为每一个应用程序创建一个ProcessRecord
。
public final class ActivityManagerService extends ActivityManagerNative
implements Watchdog.Monitor, BatteryStatsImpl.BatteryCallback {
...
private final void startProcessLocked(ProcessRecord app, String hostingType, String hostingNameStr, String abiOverride, String entryPoint, String[] entryPointArgs) {
...
try {
...
// Start the process. It will either succeed and return a result containing
// the PID of the new process, or else throw a RuntimeException.
boolean isActivityProcess = (entryPoint == null);
if (entryPoint == null) entryPoint = "android.app.ActivityThread";
Process.ProcessStartResult startResult = Process.start(entryPoint,
app.processName, uid, uid, gids, debugFlags, mountExternal,
app.info.targetSdkVersion, app.info.seinfo, requiredAbi, instructionSet,
app.info.dataDir, entryPointArgs);
...
} catch () {
...
}
}
...
}
这里主要是调用
Process:start
接口来创建一个新的进程,新的进程会导入android.app.ActivityThread
类,并且执行它的main
函数,这就是每一个应用程序都有一个ActivityThread
实例来对应的原因。
3.5 应用进程初始化
我们来看
Activity
的main
函数,这里绑定了主线程的Looper,并进入消息循环,大家应该知道,整个Android系统是消息驱动的,这也是为什么主线程默认绑定Looper的原因:
public final class ActivityThread {
...
public static void main(String[] args) {
...
Looper.prepareMainLooper();
ActivityThread thread = new ActivityThread();
thread.attach(false);
...
Looper.loop();
...
}
private void attach(boolean system) {
...
if (!system) {
...
final IActivityManager mgr = ActivityManagerNative.getDefault();
try {
mgr.attachApplication(mAppThread);
} catch (RemoteException ex) {
// Ignore
}
} else {
...
}
...
}
...
}
attach函数最终调用了
ActivityManagerService
的远程接口ActivityManagerProxy的attachApplication
函数,传入的参数是mAppThread
,这是一个ApplicationThread
类型的Binder
对象,它的作用是AMS与应用进程进行进程间通信的。
3.6 在AMS中注册应用进程,启动启动栈顶页面
前面我们提到了AMS负责系统中四大组件的启动、切换、调度及应用进程的管理和调度等工作,通过上一个流程我们知道应用进程创建后通过Binder驱动与AMS产生交互,此时AMS则将应用进程创建后的信息进行了一次注册,如果拿Windows系统程序注册到的注册表来理解这个过程,可能会更形象一些。
mMainStack.topRunningActivityLocked(null)
从堆栈顶端取出要启动的Activity
,并在realStartActivityLockedhan
函数中通过ApplicationThreadProxy
调回App进程启动页面。
public final class ActivityStackSupervisor implements DisplayListener {
...
final boolean realStartActivityLocked(ActivityRecord r,
ProcessRecord app, boolean andResume, boolean checkConfig)
throws RemoteException {
...
r.app = app;
...
try {
...
app.thread.scheduleLaunchActivity(new Intent(r.intent), r.appToken,
System.identityHashCode(r), r.info, new Configuration(mService.mConfiguration),
r.compat, r.launchedFromPackage, r.task.voiceInteractor, app.repProcState,
r.icicle, r.persistentState, results, newIntents, !andResume,
mService.isNextTransitionForward(), profilerInfo);
...
} catch (RemoteException e) {
...
}
...
}
...
}
此时在App进程,我们可以看到,经过一些列的调用链最终调用至
MainActivity:onCreate
函数,之后会调用至onResume
,而后会通知AMS该MainActivity
已经处于resume
状态。至此,整个启动流程告一段落。
4、总结
通过上述流程,相信大家可以有了一个基本的认知,这里我们忽略细节简化流程,单纯从进程角度来看下图: launch_app_sim
图上所画这里就不在赘述,Activity启动后至Resume状态,此时可交互。以上就是分析Android中应用启动流程的全部内容了,如何有疑问欢迎大家指正交流。
您可能感兴趣的文章:Android 启动activity的4种方式及打开其他应用的activity的坑Android应用启动另外一个apk应用的方法Android优化应用启动速度Android使用Intent启动其他非系统应用程序的方法android应用实现开机自动启动方法解析android创建快捷方式会启动两个应用的问题解析Android应用启动后自动创建桌面快捷方式的实现方法Android笔记之:App应用之启动界面SplashActivity的使用Android Intent启动别的应用实现方法Android应用框架之应用启动过程详解