php小编香蕉今天为大家介绍如何重写 Pop() 方法。在编程中,Pop() 方法用于删除并返回数组的最后一个元素。然而,有时我们需要对Pop()方法进行自定义,以满足特定需求。通过重写Pop()方法,我们可以添加额外的逻辑或修改返回的元素,从而更好地适应我们的代码。本文将详细介绍如何重写Pop()方法,并给出一些实例来帮助理解。让我们开始吧!
问题内容
在go的安装下,他们在container/heap/example_pq_test.go
中有一个优先级队列的示例
我粘贴整个文件的内容,以便我可以询问 pop() 方法。
// copyright 2012 the go authors. all rights reserved.
// use of this source code is governed by a bsd-style
// license that can be found in the license file.
// this example demonstrates a priority queue built using the heap interface.
package heap_test
import (
"container/heap"
"fmt"
)
// an item is something we manage in a priority queue.
type item struct {
value string // the value of the item; arbitrary.
priority int // the priority of the item in the queue.
// the index is needed by update and is maintained by the heap.interface methods.
index int // the index of the item in the heap.
}
// a priorityqueue implements heap.interface and holds items.
type priorityqueue []*item
func (pq priorityqueue) len() int { return len(pq) }
func (pq priorityqueue) less(i, j int) bool {
// we want pop to give us the highest, not lowest, priority so we use greater than here.
return pq[i].priority > pq[j].priority
}
func (pq priorityqueue) swap(i, j int) {
pq[i], pq[j] = pq[j], pq[i]
pq[i].index = i
pq[j].index = j
}
func (pq *priorityqueue) push(x any) {
n := len(*pq)
item := x.(*item)
item.index = n
*pq = append(*pq, item)
}
func (pq *priorityqueue) pop() any {
old := *pq
n := len(old)
item := old[n-1]
old[n-1] = nil // avoid memory leak
item.index = -1 // for safety
*pq = old[0 : n-1]
return item
}
// update modifies the priority and value of an item in the queue.
func (pq *priorityqueue) update(item *item, value string, priority int) {
item.value = value
item.priority = priority
heap.fix(pq, item.index)
}
// this example creates a priorityqueue with some items, adds and manipulates an item,
// and then removes the items in priority order.
func example_priorityqueue() {
// some items and their priorities.
items := map[string]int{
"banana": 3, "apple": 2, "pear": 4,
}
// create a priority queue, put the items in it, and
// establish the priority queue (heap) invariants.
pq := make(priorityqueue, len(items))
i := 0
for value, priority := range items {
pq[i] = &item{
value: value,
priority: priority,
index: i,
}
i++
}
heap.init(&pq)
// insert a new item and then modify its priority.
item := &item{
value: "orange",
priority: 1,
}
heap.push(&pq, item)
pq.update(item, item.value, 5)
// take the items out; they arrive in decreasing priority order.
for pq.len() > 0 {
item := heap.pop(&pq).(*item)
fmt.printf("%.2d:%s ", item.priority, item.value)
}
// output:
// 05:orange 04:pear 03:banana 02:apple
}
如果我有如下的 pop() 方法(不创建原始切片的深层副本),可能会带来什么危害或者是否存在谬误
func (pq *PriorityQueue) Pop2() any {
n := len(*pq)
item := (*pq)[n-1]
(*pq)[n-1] = nil // avoid memory leak
item.index = -1 // for safety
*pq = (*pq)[: n-1]
return item
}
我相信原始的 pop()
方法,这一行为切片 old := *pq
创建一个深层副本(分配一个新的底层数组)。这是真的吗?
解决方法
make
函数创建的对象,这里是map
和slice
,更像是指向数据位置的指针,而不是数据本身。
So old := *pq
的行为更像是别名,而不是数据复制。
以上就是重写 Pop() 方法的详细内容,更多请关注编程网其它相关文章!