二、代码验证
2.1 验证execute提交线程池中
2.1.1 测试代码：
public class ThreadPoolExecutorDeadTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
ExecutorService executorService = buildThreadPoolExecutor();
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute-exception"));
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
Thread.sleep(5000);
System.out.println("再次执行任务=======================");
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.execute(() -> exeTask("execute"));
}
public static ExecutorService buildThreadPoolExecutor() {
return new ThreadPoolExecutor(5, 10, 30, TimeUnit.SECONDS,
new LinkedBlockingQueue<>(1000), new ThreadFactoryBuilder().setNameFormat("test-%s").build()
, new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy());
}
private static void exeTask(String name) {
String printStr = "[thread-name:" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + ",执行方式:" + name + "]";
if ("execute-exception".equals(name)) {
throw new RuntimeException(printStr + ", 我抛异常了");
} else {
System.out.println(printStr);
}
}
}2.1.2 执行结果如下：
2.1.3 结论：
2.2 验证submit提交线程池中
2.2.1 测试代码：
public class ThreadPoolExecutorDeadTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
ExecutorService executorService = buildThreadPoolExecutor();
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute-exception"));
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
Thread.sleep(5000);
System.out.println("再次执行任务=======================");
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
executorService.submit(() -> exeTask("execute"));
}
public static ExecutorService buildThreadPoolExecutor() {
return new ThreadPoolExecutor(5, 10, 30, TimeUnit.SECONDS,
new LinkedBlockingQueue<>(1000), new ThreadFactoryBuilder().setNameFormat("test-%s").build()
, new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy());
}
private static void exeTask(String name) {
String printStr = "[thread-name:" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + ",执行方式:" + name + "]";
if ("execute-exception".equals(name)) {
throw new RuntimeException(printStr + ", 我抛异常了");
} else {
System.out.println(printStr);
}
}
}2.2.2 执行结果如下：
2.2.3 结论：
submit 提交到线程池的方式，如果执行中抛出异常，并且没有catch，不会抛出异常，不会创建新的线程。
三、源码解析
3.1java.util.concurrent.AbstractExecutorService#submit(java.lang.Runnable)
3.2 查看execute方法的执行逻辑java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor#runWorker
3.3 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor#processWorkerExit
3.4 为什么submit方法，没有创建新的线程，而是继续复用原线程？
还记得，我们在3.1的时候，发现submit也是调用了execute方法，但是在调用之前,包装了一层 RunnableFuture，那一定是在RunnableFuture的实现 FutureTask中有特殊处理了，我们查看源码可以发现。
但是，我们通过java.util.concurrent.FutureTask#get()，就可以获取对应的异常信息。
四、总结
◦当执行方式是execute时,可以看到堆栈异常的输出，线程池会把这个线程移除掉，并创建一个新的线程放到线程池中。
◦当执行方式是submit时,堆栈异常没有输出。但是调用Future.get()方法时，可以捕获到异常，不会把这个线程移除掉，也不会创建新的线程放入到线程池中。
以上俩种执行方式，都不会影响线程池里面其他线程的正常执行。
