考虑到业务层面有多数据源切换的需求
同时又要考虑事务，我使用了Mybatis-Plus3中的@DS作为多数据源的切换，它的原理的就是一个拦截器
@Override
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
try {
DynamicDataSourceContextHolder.push(determineDatasource(invocation));
return invocation.proceed();
} finally {
DynamicDataSourceContextHolder.poll();
}
}里面的pull和poll实际就是操作一个容器
在环绕里面进来做"压栈"，出去做"弹栈"，数据结构是这样的
public final class DynamicDataSourceContextHolder {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static final ThreadLocal<Deque<String>> LOOKUP_KEY_HOLDER = new ThreadLocal() {
@Override
protected Object initialValue() {
return new ArrayDeque();
}
};
private DynamicDataSourceContextHolder() {
}
public static String peek() {
return LOOKUP_KEY_HOLDER.get().peek();
}
public static void push(String ds) {
LOOKUP_KEY_HOLDER.get().push(StringUtils.isEmpty(ds) ? "" : ds);
}
public static void poll() {
Deque<String> deque = LOOKUP_KEY_HOLDER.get();
deque.poll();
if (deque.isEmpty()) {
LOOKUP_KEY_HOLDER.remove();
}
}
public static void clear() {
LOOKUP_KEY_HOLDER.remove();
}上面就是@DS大概实现，然后我就碰到坑了，外层service加了@Transactional，通过service调用另一个数据源做insert，在切面里看数据源切换了，但是还是显示事务内的数据源还是旧的，代码结构简单罗列下：
数据源
dynamic:
primary: master
strict: false
datasource:
master:
driver-class-name: com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver
url: jdbc:mysql:/phorcys-centre?useSSL=false
username: root
password: *****
interface:
url: jdbc:mysql:/phorcys-interface?useSSL=false
username: root
password: *****
driver-class-name: com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver外层controller调用的service
@Autowired
UserService userService;
@Autowired
RedisClient redisClient;
@GetMapping("/demo")
@Transactional
public GeneralResponse demo(@RequestBody(required = false) GeneralRequest request){
SysUser sysUser = new SysUser();
sysUser.setCode("wonder");
sysUser.setName("王吉坤");
sysUser.insert();
redisClient.set("token",sysUser);
List<SysUser> sysUsers = new SysUser().selectAll();
String item01 = userService.getUserInfo("ITEM01");
return GeneralResponse.success();
}内层service
@Service
public class UserServiceImpl implements UserService {
@Override
@DS("interface")
@Transactional
// @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public String getUserInfo(String name) {
SapItemRecord sr = new SapItemRecord();
sr.setBatchId(1L);
sr.setItemCode("ITEM01");
sr.setDescription("物料1号");
if(sr.insert()){
LambdaQueryWrapper<SapItemRecord> item01 = new QueryWrapper<SapItemRecord>().lambda().eq(SapItemRecord::getItemCode, name);
SapItemRecord sapItemRecord = new SapItemRecord().selectOne(item01);
ExceptionUtils.seed("内层事务异常");
// return sapItemRecord.getDescription();
}
return "response : wonder";
}
}- 1.最开始内层不加事务，全局只有一个事务，无效；
- 2.内层加事务@Transactional,无效；
- 3.改变事务的传播方式@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)，事务生效
看了java方法栈和源码，springframework5 里面spring-tx，知道问题出在什么地方，贴一个调用栈截图
spring的事务是基于aop的，这个不解释了，直接进入事务拦截器TransactionInterceptor，找到它调用的invokeWithinTransaction方法，只看本文章关注部分
根据method的注解判断是否开启事务
处理异常，在finally里处理cleanupTransactionInfo
if (txAttr == null || !(ptm instanceof CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager)) {
// Standard transaction demarcation with getTransaction and commit/rollback calls.
TransactionInfo txInfo = createTransactionIfNecessary(ptm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification);
Object retVal;
try {
// This is an around advice: Invoke the next interceptor in the chain.
// This will normally result in a target object being invoked.
retVal = invocation.proceedWithInvocation();
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
// target invocation exception
completeTransactionAfterThrowing(txInfo, ex);
throw ex;
}
finally {
cleanupTransactionInfo(txInfo);
}
....
}
protected TransactionInfo createTransactionIfNecessary(@Nullable PlatformTransactionManager tm,
@Nullable TransactionAttribute txAttr, final String joinpointIdentification) {
// If no name specified, apply method identification as transaction name.
if (txAttr != null && txAttr.getName() == null) {
txAttr = new DelegatingTransactionAttribute(txAttr) {
@Override
public String getName() {
return joinpointIdentification;
}
};
}
TransactionStatus status = null;
if (txAttr != null) {
if (tm != null) {
// 重点是这里，获取事务
status = tm.getTransaction(txAttr);
}
else {
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Skipping transactional joinpoint [" + joinpointIdentification +
"] because no transaction manager has been configured");
}
}
}
return prepareTransactionInfo(tm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification, status);
}这里就是按照不同的事务传播机制
去做不同的处理，判断是否存在事务，存在事务就执行handleExistingTransaction，不存在的话满足创建的条件就startTransaction，这里我的情形就是第一次直接创建，第二次执行exist逻辑
public final TransactionStatus getTransaction(@Nullable TransactionDefinition definition)
throws TransactionException {
// Use defaults if no transaction definition given.
TransactionDefinition def = (definition != null ? definition : TransactionDefinition.withDefaults());
Object transaction = doGetTransaction();
boolean debugEnabled = logger.isDebugEnabled();
if (isExistingTransaction(transaction)) {
// Existing transaction found -> check propagation behavior to find out how to behave.
return handleExistingTransaction(def, transaction, debugEnabled);
}
// Check definition settings for new transaction.
if (def.getTimeout() < TransactionDefinition.TIMEOUT_DEFAULT) {
throw new InvalidTimeoutException("Invalid transaction timeout", def.getTimeout());
}
// No existing transaction found -> check propagation behavior to find out how to proceed.
if (def.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_MANDATORY) {
throw new IllegalTransactionStateException(
"No existing transaction found for transaction marked with propagation 'mandatory'");
}
else if (def.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRED ||
def.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW ||
def.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NESTED) {
SuspendedResourcesHolder suspendedResources = suspend(null);
if (debugEnabled) {
logger.debug("Creating new transaction with name [" + def.getName() + "]: " + def);
}
try {
return startTransaction(def, transaction, debugEnabled, suspendedResources);
}
catch (RuntimeException | Error ex) {
resume(null, suspendedResources);
throw ex;
}
}
else {
// Create "empty" transaction: no actual transaction, but potentially synchronization.
if (def.getIsolationLevel() != TransactionDefinition.ISOLATION_DEFAULT && logger.isWarnEnabled()) {
logger.warn("Custom isolation level specified but no actual transaction initiated; " +
"isolation level will effectively be ignored: " + def);
}
boolean newSynchronization = (getTransactionSynchronization() == SYNCHRONIZATION_ALWAYS);
return prepareTransactionStatus(def, null, true, newSynchronization, debugEnabled, null);
}
}这里是创建新事务
private TransactionStatus startTransaction(TransactionDefinition definition, Object transaction,
boolean debugEnabled, @Nullable SuspendedResourcesHolder suspendedResources) {
boolean newSynchronization = (getTransactionSynchronization() != SYNCHRONIZATION_NEVER);
DefaultTransactionStatus status = newTransactionStatus(
definition, transaction, true, newSynchronization, debugEnabled, suspendedResources);
doBegin(transaction, definition); //dobegin里面关乎数据源和数据库连接
prepareSynchronization(status, definition);
return status;
}doBegin 里我最关心两点，一个是数据库连接的选择和初始化，一个是把事务的自动提交关掉
这里就能解释得通，为什么@Transactional里的数据源还是旧的。因为开启事务的同时，会去数据库连接池拿数据库连接，如果只开启一个事务，在切面时候会获取数据源，设置dataSource；如果在内层的service使用@DS切换了数据源，实际上是又做了一层拦截，改变了DataSourceHolder的栈顶dataSource，对于整个事务的连接是没有影响的，在这个事务切面内的所有数据库的操作都会使用代理之后的事务连接，所以会产生数据源没有切换的问题
对于数据源的切换，必然要更替数据库连接
我的理解是必须改变事务的传播机制，产生新的事务，所以第一内层service不仅要加@DS，还要加@Transactional注解，并且指定
Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW，因为这样在处理handleExistingTransaction 时，就会走这段逻辑
if (definition.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW) {
if (debugEnabled) {
logger.debug("Suspending current transaction, creating new transaction with name [" +
definition.getName() + "]");
}
SuspendedResourcesHolder suspendedResources = suspend(transaction);
try {
return startTransaction(definition, transaction, debugEnabled, suspendedResources);
}
catch (RuntimeException | Error beginEx) {
resumeAfterBeginException(transaction, suspendedResources, beginEx);
throw beginEx;
}
}走startTransaction，再doBegin，创建新事务，重新拿切换之后的dataSource作为新事务的conn，这样内层事务的数据源就是@DS注解内的，从而完成了数据源切换并且事务生效，PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW 方式下，事务的回滚都是生效的，亲测，所以使用MybatisPlus3.x的可以使用@DS了，当然你也可以自己写切面去切换DataSource，原理跟DS差不多，我用baomidou，因为它香啊！但是我觉得baomidou在考虑切换数据源的时候，本身要考虑事务的，但是人家是这样说的
以上为个人经验，希望能给大家一个参考，也希望大家多多支持编程网。
